Is it coercive control? / HAR / HAR-5
HAR-5
Third-party and proxy harassment
Definition
Contacting, following, questioning, or recruiting friends, family members, coworkers, neighbors, or other third parties to obtain information about the target, deliver messages, monitor activities, or apply pressure, thereby extending the control regime through the target's support network.
How it operates
Calls or messages to the target's workplace, coworkers, family, or friends seeking personal information, making allegations, to establish "my side of the story," or to gain the favor of. Instructing or encouraging third parties to report on the target's movements or contacts. Using children or mutual acquaintances as intermediaries for unwanted contact or information-gathering.
Function
Isolate the target, assert power and control, gain attention, generate secondary surveillance, and make the social environment itself a site of intrusion.
Harm
Cumulative loss of autonomy, safety, and space for action.
Why this is coercive control
Ordinary, limited logistical contact with shared providers or family that remains within agreed or court-ordered channels and does not seek extraneous personal information or apply pressure. The conduct here isolates the target, asserts power and control, gains attention, generates secondary surveillance, and makes the social environment itself a site of intrusion.
Constructed example
“I called your sister and let her know you lied to me. She told me you were out late. Interesting that you didn't mention that.”
Fictitious. Written to illustrate the behavior. Not a case.
Dragiewicz et al. 2018; Spearman et al. 2023; Toews & Bermea 2017; Woodlock 2017.
Literature this family is drawn from
- Harris, B., & Woodlock, D. (2019). Digital coercive control: Insights from two landmark domestic violence studies. The British Journal of Criminology, 59(3), 530-550.
- Forensic linguistic evidence of psychological abuse and discursive manipulation in cyberstalking cases. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict (2026).
Identifying a behavior described here does not establish a pattern of behavior and does not establish coercive control. A tactic is not a regime. The instrument consolidates peer-reviewed literature so a reader can check when in doubt. The instrument is not a coding manual. Carlton Research does not provide the instrument as a weapon.
© 2026 Carisa Carlton.
Carlton, C. (2026). Is it coercive control?: HAR-5. Carlton Research Instruments. /codebook/har-5. Last reviewed August 31, 2026.