Is it coercive control? / HAR / HAR-2

HAR-2

Social media attack campaigns and public online humiliation

Definition

Use of social media platforms or other public digital spaces to post, share, or amplify content that denigrates, exposes, or isolates the target, including smear campaigns, doxxing of private information, or coordinated public shaming that functions to damage reputation, sever support networks, and maintain presence in the target's social world.

How it operates

Public posts or comments that characterize the target as unstable, unfit, dishonest, or dangerous. Sharing private communications or personal details out of context. Tagging, mentioning, or directing mutual contacts to damaging content. Creation of accounts or groups for the purpose of ongoing public attack.

Function

Convert the target's online and offline community into an instrument of control and degradation.

Harm

The conversion of the target's online and offline community into an instrument of control and degradation.

Why this is coercive control

Private messages that do not reach a wider audience, and accurate limited statements in formal legal filings without public distribution, are not this conduct. The conduct here converts the target's online and offline community into an instrument of control and degradation.

Constructed example

A post to mutual friends and family stating, "She abandoned the children for her own agenda. Here's the proof," accompanied by selective screenshots.

Fictitious. Written to illustrate the behavior. Not a case.

Dragiewicz et al. 2018; Spearman et al. 2023; Harris & Woodlock 2019; Woodlock 2017.

Literature this family is drawn from

  • Harris, B., & Woodlock, D. (2019). Digital coercive control: Insights from two landmark domestic violence studies. The British Journal of Criminology, 59(3), 530-550.
  • Forensic linguistic evidence of psychological abuse and discursive manipulation in cyberstalking cases. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict (2026).

Literature map

Forums that enumerate this family

A statute that names a tactic is not a finding that the tactic is present.

Identifying a behavior described here does not establish a pattern of behavior and does not establish coercive control. A tactic is not a regime. The instrument consolidates peer-reviewed literature so a reader can check when in doubt. The instrument is not a coding manual. Carlton Research does not provide the instrument as a weapon.

© 2026 Carisa Carlton.

How to cite

Carlton, C. (2026). Is it coercive control?: HAR-2. Carlton Research Instruments. /codebook/har-2. Last reviewed August 31, 2026.