Is it coercive control? / HAR

Category 13

Harassment

Relentless pursuit and interruption: flooding, public smear, image-based abuse, unwanted presence, proxy harassment, and other disturbance of peace. Function and density relative to need, not the tone of any one message.

Dragiewicz et al. 2018; Harris & Woodlock 2019; Stark 2007; Toews & Bermea 2017; Woodlock 2017; Henry et al. 2023.

Literature this family is drawn from

  • Harris, B., & Woodlock, D. (2019). Digital coercive control: Insights from two landmark domestic violence studies. The British Journal of Criminology, 59(3), 530-550.
  • Forensic linguistic evidence of psychological abuse and discursive manipulation in cyberstalking cases. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict (2026).

Literature map

Forums that enumerate this family

A statute that names a tactic is not a finding that the tactic is present.

Identifying a behavior described here does not establish a pattern of behavior and does not establish coercive control. A tactic is not a regime. The instrument consolidates peer-reviewed literature so a reader can check when in doubt. The instrument is not a coding manual. Carlton Research does not provide the instrument as a weapon.

How to cite

Carlton, C. (2026). Is it coercive control?: HAR Harassment. Carlton Research Instruments. /codebook/har. Last reviewed August 31, 2026.