Is it coercive control? / REC / REC-2
REC-2
Weaponized affection and love-bombing
Definition
Intense, often premature or exaggerated expressions of love, unique connection, destiny, value, or belonging that function to create a false sense of safety, lower the target's defenses, condition rapid attachment, and establish intermittent reinforcement.
How it operates
Early or rapidly escalating declarations of love, soulmate status, or permanent bond that arrive before corresponding knowledge or trust exists. Hyperbolic or totalizing claims of the target's unique value used as a lure. Demonstrative generosity, gifts, or grand gestures timed to disarm resistance or reverse separation moves. Sequences in which high-affection messages are followed by silence, coldness, incongruent behavior, or coded control.
Function
Create a false sense of safety, lower the target's defenses, condition rapid attachment, and prepare the ground for devaluation, isolation, and later tactics.
Harm
Primary: the flood of affectional language and attention rewires the target's neurobiology (oxytocin and dopamine pathways) so that subsequent withdrawal produces confusion, anxiety, self-doubt, and dependence. What appears as love is a control mechanism that prepares the ground for devaluation, isolation, and later tactics.
Why this is coercive control
Steady, reciprocal care that develops gradually, without later withdrawal used as leverage, is ordinary affection. The conduct here creates a false sense of safety and conditions rapid attachment so later control can land.
Constructed example
“Since the day I met you, our connection is even beyond ourselves. I love you and I cherish and relish all of your being. ". Followed by unexplained silence or devaluation.”
Fictitious. Written to illustrate the behavior. Not a case.
Dutton & Painter 1993; Singer 1995; Stark 2007.
Literature this family is drawn from
- Dutton, D. G., & Painter, S. (1993). Emotional attachments in abusive relationships: A test of traumatic bonding theory. Violence and Victims, 8(2), 105-120.
Identifying a behavior described here does not establish a pattern of behavior and does not establish coercive control. A tactic is not a regime. The instrument consolidates peer-reviewed literature so a reader can check when in doubt. The instrument is not a coding manual. Carlton Research does not provide the instrument as a weapon.
© 2026 Carisa Carlton.
Carlton, C. (2026). Is it coercive control?: REC-2. Carlton Research Instruments. /codebook/rec-2. Last reviewed August 31, 2026.