Is it coercive control? / DEG / DEG-3

DEG-3

Attacks on competence in valued roles

Definition

Messaging that explicitly or implicitly positions the target as a failure in roles that carry personal or social value, most commonly parenting, work, or partnership.

How it operates

Implicit or explicit statements that the target is a bad parent, incompetent worker, or failed partner, and claims that others would be better off without them.

Function

Undermine the target's sense of efficacy and make competency in those roles appear impossible.

Harm

The erosion of confidence in the very domains that support autonomy and self-respect.

Why this is coercive control

Specific, bounded criticism of a single act that does not generalize to the person's overall competence. The conduct here undermines the target's sense of efficacy and make competency in those roles appear impossible.

Constructed example

A real parent would never have let that happen. You're not fit for this.

Fictitious. Written to illustrate the behavior. Not a case.

Kurbatfinski et al. 2025; Gampe, Jeffries & Rathus 2025; Stark 2007.

Also in DEG

Literature this family is drawn from

  • Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. Oxford University Press.
  • Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth model. Springer.

Literature map

Forums that enumerate this family

A statute that names a tactic is not a finding that the tactic is present.

Identifying a behavior described here does not establish a pattern of behavior and does not establish coercive control. A tactic is not a regime. The instrument consolidates peer-reviewed literature so a reader can check when in doubt. The instrument is not a coding manual. Carlton Research does not provide the instrument as a weapon.

© 2026 Carisa Carlton.

How to cite

Carlton, C. (2026). Is it coercive control?: DEG-3. Carlton Research Instruments. /codebook/deg-3. Last reviewed August 31, 2026.