Is it coercive control? / DEG / DEG-1

DEG-1

Insults and name-calling

Definition

Direct verbal abuse consisting of slurs, epithets, characterological attacks, or repeated pejoratives directed at the target's person rather than a specific disputed fact.

How it operates

Repeated pejoratives, contemptuous nicknames, and blanket character judgments not tied to a disputed fact.

Function

Lower the target's self-regard and mark them as inferior.

Harm

The steady accumulation of verbal injury that erodes confidence and makes the target more susceptible to further control.

Why this is coercive control

Profanity directed at a situation rather than the person, and disputes about the accuracy of a specific claim when the dispute remains focused on the fact itself. The conduct here lowers the target's self-regard and mark them as inferior.

Constructed example

You are honestly the most useless person I've ever met. Ivan the Terrible!

Fictitious. Written to illustrate the behavior. Not a case.

Gampe, Jeffries & Rathus 2025; Pence & Paymar 1993; Stark 2007.

Also in DEG

Literature this family is drawn from

  • Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. Oxford University Press.
  • Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth model. Springer.

Literature map

Forums that enumerate this family

A statute that names a tactic is not a finding that the tactic is present.

Identifying a behavior described here does not establish a pattern of behavior and does not establish coercive control. A tactic is not a regime. The instrument consolidates peer-reviewed literature so a reader can check when in doubt. The instrument is not a coding manual. Carlton Research does not provide the instrument as a weapon.

© 2026 Carisa Carlton.

How to cite

Carlton, C. (2026). Is it coercive control?: DEG-1. Carlton Research Instruments. /codebook/deg-1. Last reviewed August 31, 2026.