Coercive Control Field Check / DEG / DEG-2

DEG-2

Humiliation and Shaming

Definition

Statements or acts designed to embarrass, expose, or produce shame in the target, including public humiliation, weaponized public shaming, and post-separation reputation attacks.

How it operates

Mocking in group settings or threads, statements that "everyone" thinks the target is pathetic, sharing or threatening to share embarrassing material, and campaigns that attack the target's reputation with family, friends, colleagues, or online audiences.

Function

Damage the target's standing with others and internalize shame so that the target self-censors or withdraws.

Harm

Public and private loss of dignity, social withdrawal, and the conversion of the target's network into a site of potential exposure.

Why this is coercive control

Private disagreement that lacks an audience or shaming frame. The conduct here damages the target's standing with others and internalize shame so that the target self-censors or withdraws.

Constructed example

“Hey Linda, have you had plastic surgery? Did you get your nose done? Don't you guys think it looks like she's had plastic surgery?”

Fictitious. Written to illustrate the behavior. Not a case.

Kurbatfinski et al. 2025; Gampe, Jeffries & Rathus 2025; Pence & Paymar 1993; Stark 2007.

Also in DEG

Literature this family is drawn from

  • Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. Oxford University Press.
  • Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth model. Springer.

Literature map

Forums that enumerate this family

A statute that lists a tactic is not a finding that the tactic is present.

© 2026 Carisa Carlton.

How to cite

Carlton, C. (2026). Coercive Control Field Check: DEG-2. Coercive Control Observatory. Last reviewed August 31, 2026.