Is it coercive control? / CRIM / CRIM-2

CRIM-2

Forced participation in, or concealment of, harm to children

Definition

The abuser compels the target to take part in, witness, enable, or conceal harm to a child (physical, sexual, emotional, or neglect), or sets conditions that prevent the target from protecting the child, then treats that inability as the target's own failure.

How it operates

Compelled silence: the target is forbidden to report, seek medical care, or disclose, under threat of further violence, loss of the children, exposure of the target's own coerced criminality, immigration consequences, or other leverage. Manufactured failure to protect: the abuser creates the conditions that make protection impossible, then presents that inability to institutions as the target's neglect.

Function

Eliminate the adult target's protective agency, harm the children as a means of punishing the adult, and manufacture child-protection and criminal liability that the abuser can later spend as leverage.

Harm

For children: direct abuse, concealment of injury, delayed care, and a parent who cannot protect them. For the adult target: moral injury, criminal or child-protection liability, loss of custody, and the knowledge that disclosing the child's harm may cost the children or the target's liberty.

Why this is coercive control

Once children and the adult target are understood as co-victims of the same campaign, the failure-to-protect frame collapses. The adult target's capacity to protect was itself a target of the campaign. Ordinary parental disagreement about discipline does not compel participation in harm to a child, compel silence about a child's injuries, or later spend that silence as official liability.

Constructed example

If you take her to the hospital they will ask questions. You already have a record. Keep your mouth shut or they will take her.

Fictitious. Written to illustrate the behavior. Not a case.

Douglas & Walsh 2010; Humphreys & Absler 2011; Katz 2016, 2022.

Also in CRIM

Literature this family is drawn from

  • Bettinson, V. (2022). A comparative analysis of the defence of duress in England and Wales and Scotland: Implications for victims of coercive control. Journal of Criminal Law.

Literature map

Forums that enumerate this family

A statute that names a tactic is not a finding that the tactic is present.

Identifying a behavior described here does not establish a pattern of behavior and does not establish coercive control. A tactic is not a regime. The instrument consolidates peer-reviewed literature so a reader can check when in doubt. The instrument is not a coding manual. Carlton Research does not provide the instrument as a weapon.

© 2026 Carisa Carlton.

How to cite

Carlton, C. (2026). Is it coercive control?: CRIM-2. Carlton Research Instruments. /codebook/crim-2. Last reviewed August 31, 2026.