Is it coercive control? / CHI / CHI-5

CHI-5

Gatekeeping access to the child's providers, records, and information

Definition

Controlling or restricting the other parent's independent access to the child's medical, mental-health, educational, or extracurricular providers, records, or related information channels, such that the gatekeeping parent becomes the obligatory intermediary. This may occur through instructions to third parties, unilateral rules imposed on the co-parent, or both.

How it operates

Instructing providers or institutions that the other parent may not contact them, or that all communication must be routed through the abuser. Imposing a rule that the other parent is prohibited from contacting providers or must obtain permission or route all inquiries through the abuser, when the governing court order does not expressly authorize exclusive communication rights. Withholding, delaying, or selectively controlling access to portals, records, appointment information, or provider contact details. Treating final decision-making authority as automatically conferring exclusive contact or information-control rights when the order does not so state.

Function

Monopolize information and institutional relationships.

Harm

For the children: delayed or incomplete care and the loss of two-parent informational support. For the target: exclusion from knowledge required to parent effectively.

Why this is coercive control

Accurate implementation of a court order that expressly grants exclusive communication rights, and ordinary logistical coordination through a designated channel, is not this conduct. The conduct here monopolizes information and institutional relationships.

Constructed example

Going forward, all communication with the children's teachers need to come through me. I've already let the admin office know that I am the point of contact, not you.

Fictitious. Written to illustrate the behavior. Not a case.

Elizabeth 2017; Miller & Smolter 2011; Spearman et al. 2023, 2025; Stark 2007.

Literature this family is drawn from

  • Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. Oxford University Press.
  • Katz, E. (2016). Beyond the physical incident model: How children living with domestic violence are harmed by and resist regimes of coercive control. Child Abuse Review, 25(1), 46-59.
  • Douglas, H. (2018). Legal systems abuse and coercive control. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 18(1), 84-99.
  • Miller, S. L., & Smolter, N. L. (2011). “Paper abuse”: When all else fails, batterers use procedural stalking. Violence Against Women, 17(5), 637-650.
  • Domestic Abuse (Scotland) Act 2018.

Literature map

Identifying a behavior described here does not establish a pattern of behavior and does not establish coercive control. A tactic is not a regime. The instrument consolidates peer-reviewed literature so a reader can check when in doubt. The instrument is not a coding manual. Carlton Research does not provide the instrument as a weapon.

© 2026 Carisa Carlton.

How to cite

Carlton, C. (2026). Is it coercive control?: CHI-5. Carlton Research Instruments. /codebook/chi-5. Last reviewed August 31, 2026.