Is it coercive control? / REG / REG-4
REG-4
Rule enforcement and punishment rituals
Definition
The abuser invents a private rule, not actually found in any law, custom, order, or agreement, and presents it as binding, attaching a real or implied penalty for noncompliance. The defining element is the punishment mechanism, not the mere existence of a rule; a rule with no consequence attached is not REG-4.
How it operates
An invented condition on contact, information, or access, paired with a stated or clearly implied cost for violating it. Permission-seeking demanded of the target for matters the abuser has no authority over. Enumerated consequences for infractions of a regime the abuser alone has authored.
Function
Keep the target in a state of continuous assessment and uncertainty.
Harm
Chronic hypervigilance and the impossibility of predicting what will trigger punishment or chaos.
Why this is coercive control
Accurate citation of an actual court order or agreement, even when cited firmly, repeatedly, or over a minor point. The conduct here keeps the target in a state of continuous assessment and uncertainty.
Constructed example
“You cannot attend our child's football games because the orders clearly state you cannot attend parent-teacher conferences, and this is the same thing.”
Fictitious. Written to illustrate the behavior. Not a case.
Choudhury, Martland & Luzon 2025; Crossman & Hardesty 2018; Stark 2007.
Literature this family is drawn from
- Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. Oxford University Press.
- Stark, E., & Hester, M. (2019). Coercive control: Update and review. Violence Against Women, 25(1), 81-104.
- Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth model. Springer.
- Fontes, L. A. (2015). Invisible chains: Overcoming coercive control in your intimate relationship. Guilford Press.
- Dutton, M. A., & Goodman, L. A. (2005). Coercion in intimate partner violence: Toward a new conceptualization. Sex Roles, 52(11-12), 743-756.
- Crossman, K. A., Hardesty, J. L., & Raffaelli, M. (2016). “He could scare me without laying a hand on me”: Mothers’ experiences of nonviolent coercive control during marriage and after separation. Violence Against Women, 22(4), 454-473.
- Serious Crime Act 2015, s. 76 (England and Wales) (controlling or coercive behaviour in an intimate or family relationship).
- Cal. Fam. Code § 6320(c), as amended by 2020 Cal. Stat. ch. 248 (SB 1141).
Identifying a behavior described here does not establish a pattern of behavior and does not establish coercive control. A tactic is not a regime. The instrument consolidates peer-reviewed literature so a reader can check when in doubt. The instrument is not a coding manual. Carlton Research does not provide the instrument as a weapon.
© 2026 Carisa Carlton.
Carlton, C. (2026). Is it coercive control?: REG-4. Carlton Research Instruments. /codebook/reg-4. Last reviewed August 31, 2026.