Is it coercive control? / PATH / PATH-2

PATH-2

Pathologizing the target to third parties

Definition

The abuser presents the target to third parties (family, friends, therapists, attorneys, custody evaluators, police, clinicians) as unstable, untrustworthy, or mentally ill in order to destroy the target's credibility with those parties, isolate the target from support and belonging, and elevate the abuser's standing as the credible, concerned party. In litigation-active cases or institutional settings, the abuser may actively recruit or manipulate therapists, attorneys, evaluators, and other professionals. Real traumatic events or mental-health facts may be disclosed selectively ("she tried to commit suicide," "even her father hates her and sued her") to paint the target as the problem.

How it operates

Statements to third parties that the target is crazy, unstable, delusional, or a danger. Selective disclosure of real trauma or mental-health history to discredit rather than to seek help for the target. Efforts to influence therapists, custody evaluators, courts, attorneys, or police with pathologizing narratives. Framing the target's credible reports of abuse as symptoms of mental illness.

Function

Institutional isolation and the conversion of potential sources of support into agents of discredit.

Harm

Institutional isolation. Potential sources of support become agents of discredit.

Why this is coercive control

Accurate, non-weaponized sharing of concern for the target's well-being with appropriate professionals, when the primary aim is support rather than control, is not this conduct. The conduct here isolates the target from institutions and converts potential sources of support into agents of discredit.

Constructed example

She's been unstable for years. She tried to commit suicide and her own father sued her. Anything she tells you about me comes from that place. I'm the one trying to keep things calm.

Fictitious. Written to illustrate the behavior. Not a case.

Cooper & Sweet 2025; Freyd 1997; Smith & Freyd 2014; Stark 2007; Sweet 2019.

Also in PATH

Literature this family is drawn from

  • Sweet, P. L. (2019). The sociology of gaslighting. American Sociological Review, 84(5), 851-875.

Literature map

Identifying a behavior described here does not establish a pattern of behavior and does not establish coercive control. A tactic is not a regime. The instrument consolidates peer-reviewed literature so a reader can check when in doubt. The instrument is not a coding manual. Carlton Research does not provide the instrument as a weapon.

© 2026 Carisa Carlton.

How to cite

Carlton, C. (2026). Is it coercive control?: PATH-2. Carlton Research Instruments. /codebook/path-2. Last reviewed August 31, 2026.